Home Product Services Company Contact Us
CoreLayer SecureAI Platform

Five Modules. One Unified Security Lifecycle.

From the first system prompt to runtime inference to end-user interaction — CoreLayer SecureAI instruments security at every phase of AI deployment. Each module is powerful standalone. Together, they form a cross-phase intelligence loop that gets smarter with every threat.

Build Radar Test Striker Validate Vault Runtime Shield User SecureAgent
Phase 1 — Build

CoreLayer Radar

LLM Risk Scanner — Static analysis of prompts, templates & tool configurations before a single line ships to production.

Most AI security vulnerabilities originate at the Build phase — in the system prompts, tool configurations, and instruction templates that define how a model behaves. Radar is a static analysis engine that identifies these vulnerabilities before deployment, when fixing them costs nothing and ignoring them costs everything. It runs entirely locally, meaning zero prompt content ever leaves the machine.

2 CRITICAL FINDINGS SCANNING PROMPTS
9+
Security Rule Engine
100%
Local Execution
10+
OWASP Mappings
Zero
Cloud Data Upload
🔍
AST-Style Prompt Parsing
Deep instruction hierarchy analysis that dissects system prompts the same way a compiler analyses source code. Identifies role override surfaces, context boundary gaps, instruction conflicts, and injection entry points invisible to manual review.
📋
9+ Security Rule Engine
Covers prompt injection risk, instruction override patterns, unsafe role assignments, missing refusal logic, over-permissive tool definitions, sensitive data exposure in templates, unrestricted output formatting, missing context boundaries, and ambiguous operational scope.
🗺
OWASP LLM Top 10 Mapping
Every finding is classified against the OWASP LLM Top 10 framework with severity rating (Critical / High / Medium / Low), an exploit simulation showing how the vulnerability would be triggered in production, and patch-level remediation guidance.
CI/CD Integration
Run cl-ai scan ./prompts directly from your terminal or embed in GitHub Actions as a pre-deployment gate. Build fails if any Critical findings remain unresolved. Security becomes part of the engineering contract.
🔗
Tool Configuration Audit
Analyses every tool definition attached to your LLM — identifying over-permissive access scopes, missing authorization checks, undeclared side effects, and tool chaining vulnerabilities before they reach the runtime environment.
📊
Developer-First Reporting
Generates JSON, HTML, and SARIF-format reports with per-finding severity, exact location in the prompt template, reproduction steps, and specific remediation instructions. Integrates with VS Code, IntelliJ, and all major IDEs.
How Radar Works
01
Ingest
Point Radar at your prompts, agent configs & tool definitions
02
Parse
AST-style decomposition of instruction hierarchy
03
Analyse
9+ security rules applied across all components
04
Report
OWASP-mapped findings with severity & remediation
05
Enforce
CI/CD gate — build fails if Critical findings exist
terminal — CoreLayer Radar scan
# Install and run Radar locally $ pip install corelayer-radar # Scan your prompt directory $ cl-ai scan ./prompts --rules owasp --output report.json # Output ✓ Scanned: 12 prompt templates, 8 tool configs CRITICAL: LLM01 Prompt Injection — system_prompt.txt:L14 → Role override surface detected. Missing refusal boundary. → Patch: Add explicit role constraint at instruction boundary. HIGH: LLM06 Excessive Agency — tool_config.yaml:L23 → Over-permissive tool scope. Missing authorization check. MEDIUM: LLM07 System Prompt Leakage — agent.py:L45 Severity score: 72/100 — requires remediation before deployment

Ready to scan your AI system prompts?

CoreLayer Radar runs entirely locally. No cloud dependency, no data upload, no risk.

Request a Demo →
Phase 2 — Test

CoreLayer Striker

Adversarial Simulation Engine — 2,000+ attack payloads across 15 categories with deterministic, reproducible results and CI/CD pipeline enforcement.

Functional testing tells you if an AI system works. Adversarial testing tells you if it can be broken. Striker simulates the full spectrum of real-world attacks against your LLM — from prompt injection and jailbreaks to multi-turn coercion sequences and data exfiltration attempts. Every test is reproducible, every result is OWASP-mapped, and every attack failure becomes a CI/CD gate.

STRIKER — ADVERSARIAL SIMULATION Prompt Injection (430+) Role Confusion (250+) Policy Bypass (200+) Output Escape (150+) Multi-turn Coercion (300+) 2,000+ ATTACK PAYLOADS ACTIVE
2,000+
Attack Payloads
15
Attack Categories
3
Phase Methodology
Monthly
Payload Updates
2,000+ Attack Payloads Across 15 Categories
Role confusion (250+), instruction negation (180+), policy bypass (200+), output escape (150+), multi-turn coercion (300+), prompt injection (430+), jailbreak sequences, data exfiltration, tool abuse, context manipulation, and more. Monthly updates with new payloads.
🔁
Three-Phase Testing Methodology
Reconnaissance: baseline the model's normal behaviour and refusal patterns. Attack: deploy adaptive multi-turn sequences that escalate based on model responses. Verification: eliminate false positives with confirmation passes. Every result is deterministic and reproducible.
🔗
CI/CD Pipeline Enforcement
Native GitHub Actions integration. Define failure thresholds per attack category — build fails if attack success rate exceeds your configured ceiling. Security becomes a testable, version-controlled part of your engineering pipeline.
🧠
Adaptive Multi-Turn Sequencing
Striker doesn't just fire static payloads — it reads model responses and adapts subsequent attacks based on what it learns. This mirrors real attacker behaviour and surfaces vulnerabilities that single-turn testing completely misses.
📊
Risk Escalation Reporting
Full output per test run: successful attack prompts, verbatim model responses, attack success rate per category, OWASP LLM Top 10 classification, risk escalation pathway, and prioritised remediation recommendations.
🔄
Intelligence Feedback to Radar
Every successful Striker attack automatically generates a new Radar scanner rule. Vulnerabilities found during testing become static analysis checks that catch the same pattern in future prompts at the Build phase.
github-actions.yml — Striker CI integration
# .github/workflows/ai-security.yml name: CoreLayer AI Security Gate on: [push, pull_request] jobs: ai-security: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Run CoreLayer Striker run: | cl-ai test --endpoint $MODEL_ENDPOINT \ --payloads 2000 --categories all \ --threshold 5% --output results.json - name: Fail on Critical Attacks run: cl-ai assert --input results.json --max-critical 0 # Result: Build blocked — attack success rate 4.2% CRITICAL: Role confusion attack succeeded on turn 3 Action required: Harden system prompt before merge

See how your AI holds up against real attacks

Striker simulates 2,000+ attack payloads against your live model. Find out before your adversaries do.

Request a Demo →
Phase 3 — Validate

CoreLayer Vault

RAG Security Analyzer + Guardrail Checker — Validate your entire AI deployment security before going live, with a scored certification report.

The Validate phase sits between development and production — it's your last structured opportunity to find security gaps before real users interact with your AI system. Vault performs two complementary assessments: a deep RAG pipeline security scan covering vector databases, retrieval parameters, and embedding configurations; and a guardrail checker that validates every safety layer your system relies on.

DEPLOYMENT SCORE 84 / 100 CERTIFIED FOR PRODUCTION
0–100
Deployment Score
RAG+
Pipeline Security Scan
Auto
Hardened Prompt Generation
Full
Guardrail Validation
🗄
RAG Pipeline Security Scan
Validates vector DB configuration, embedding scope boundaries, metadata access controls, retrieval parameter safety, cross-tenant isolation, data poisoning risk in the knowledge base, and post-retrieval filter completeness. Catches leakage vectors before they reach users.
🛡
Guardrail Checker
Pre-deployment gate validating system prompt hardening completeness, tool permission boundaries, output validation rules, safe-by-default behaviour baselines, input sanitisation coverage, and monitoring configuration. Generates a missing-guardrail findings list with specific fixes.
🎯
Secure Deployment Score
A 0–100 composite score calculated from RAG security posture, guardrail coverage, prompt hardening quality, and configuration safety. Includes specific missing-guardrail findings, AI-generated hardened prompt suggestions, and deployment readiness certification for compliance reporting.
🔬
Data Poisoning Detection
Identifies poisoned embeddings, unsafe chunking strategies that expose internal document structure, and over-permissive metadata access patterns that enable retrieval-layer exfiltration attacks — including cross-tenant data exposure in multi-tenant RAG deployments.
📝
Hardened Prompt Generation
For every vulnerability found in system prompts, Vault generates an AI-assisted hardened version with explicit role constraints, refusal boundaries, output format enforcement, and injection resistance patterns applied. Engineers receive a ready-to-deploy replacement, not just a problem report.
📜
Compliance Certification
Vault generates machine-readable compliance artifacts: deployment readiness certificates, OWASP coverage evidence, RAG security audit logs, and guardrail configuration snapshots. These feed directly into HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, and NIST AI RMF reporting workflows.

Know your deployment score before going live

Vault certifies your AI system is production-ready — with a scored report your CISO and board can trust.

Request a Demo →
Phase 4 — Runtime

CoreLayer Shield

Unified Runtime Defense — LCAC (Prevent) + LBF (Detect) + CBE (Enforce) operating as one defense-in-depth layer at inference time.

Once an AI system is live, the threat surface shifts to the inference loop — where real prompts, real users, and real tool executions intersect. Shield instruments the inference graph directly with three complementary engines that operate at sub-10ms latency: LCAC controls what the model sees, LBF detects how it behaves, and CBE limits what it can do. Together they form an adaptive runtime defense that gets smarter as the system is attacked.

LCAC LBF CBE <10ms POLICY EVALUATION RUNTIME DEFENSE ACTIVE
<10ms
Policy Evaluation
3
Defense Engines
Zero-day
Behavioral Detection
YAML
Policy as Code
🔒
LCAC — Layered Context Access Control
Controls WHAT the model sees at inference time. Identity-aware inference boundaries enforce who can access what context. Tenant isolation prevents cross-user data leakage. Tool-level authorization limits which capabilities each user identity can invoke. All policies defined in version-controlled YAML.
📡
LBF — LLM Behaviour Fingerprinting
Detects HOW the model behaves, not just what inputs it receives. Constructs per-model behavioral fingerprints from token entropy baselines, refusal frequency patterns, and tool invocation vectors. Deviations from fingerprint trigger anomaly alerts — catching zero-day jailbreaks no signature-based system can detect.
CBE — Capability Boundary Enforcer
Limits WHAT the model can do. Hard-limits on tool chaining depth, execution ceilings per session, resource consumption thresholds, and action surface expansion. When CBE detects boundary violation, it blocks the action automatically — prevention is the response, not a manual remediation workflow.
🔗
Cross-Engine Intelligence
The three engines share a unified telemetry channel: LBF detects behavioral anomaly → LCAC auto-tightens context access → CBE lowers execution ceilings. Runtime anomalies are propagated back to Radar as new scanner rules and to Striker as new attack payloads.
📋
Policy as Code
All Shield policies are defined in YAML, version-controlled in Git, and deployed through the same CI/CD pipeline as application code. Security posture becomes auditable, rollback-capable, and peer-reviewable — treating AI security policy like software.
🔌
Universal Integration
Shield integrates with all major SIEM platforms (Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, IBM QRadar), SOAR platforms (Palo Alto XSOAR, Splunk SOAR), EDR solutions (CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Microsoft Defender), and NDR tools. Runtime telemetry flows directly into your existing security operations centre.
Python SDK — CoreLayer Shield integration
# CoreLayer Shield — Runtime enforcement from corelayer import LCAC, LBF, CBE, Shield # Load policy from version-controlled YAML shield = Shield.from_policy("./policy.yaml") # Wrap every LLM call with Shield enforcement @shield.enforce def call_llm(user_ctx, prompt): return llm_client.complete(prompt) # Shield automatically: # LCAC → filters context based on user identity # LBF → fingerprints response for anomalies # CBE → enforces tool chain depth limits response = call_llm(user_ctx, prompt) shield.telemetry.export_to_siem("splunk")

Secure your AI inference loop in production

Shield deploys in hours, not weeks. Sub-10ms latency. No architecture rewrite required.

Request a Demo →
Phase 5 — End User

CoreLayer SecureAgent

Local-first sensitive data masking — intercepts PII, credentials, and secrets before any prompt reaches an LLM, with zero data collection.

Every enterprise employee who interacts with an LLM is a potential data leakage vector — pasting API keys, financial identifiers, patient records, or internal credentials into external AI systems without thinking. SecureAgent operates at the user layer, intercepting sensitive data before it leaves the device. No data is ever collected, stored, or transmitted. It runs entirely locally — privacy by architecture, not just by policy.

API_KEY PAN / AADHAAR CREDENTIALS CREDIT CARD 🛡 MASKED ████████ ✓ SAFE TO SEND LOCAL-FIRST · ZERO DATA COLLECTION
100%
Local Processing
Zero
Data Collected
4
Deployment Modes
15+
PII Entity Types
👤
Comprehensive PII Detection
Detects and masks 15+ sensitive entity types: API keys, passwords, secrets, email addresses, phone numbers, Aadhaar numbers, PAN cards, credit card numbers, IFSC codes, UPI IDs, internal credentials, passport numbers, medical record identifiers, and more. All detection runs locally.
🏠
Zero Data Architecture
Local-first by design. Zero data is collected, stored, or transmitted to any server — not even anonymised telemetry. Your sensitive information never leaves the device. This is enterprise-grade privacy by architecture: privacy guarantees that cannot be violated by a policy change or a data breach.
🔌
Four Deployment Modes
Browser Extension: intercepts PII in all browser-based LLM interactions (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Copilot). CLI Tool: masks prompts before API calls from the command line. SDK: Python / Node.js / Go library for application integration. API Proxy: route all LLM calls through CoreLayer's local proxy for org-wide masking.
🔄
Reversible Masking
For application integrations where the original value must be restored in the response, SecureAgent supports reversible masking — replacing sensitive values with tokens that can be de-tokenised in post-processing. The LLM sees masked values; your application receives the original data.
📜
AI Interaction Audit Trail
Generates a complete audit log of all masked interactions — what was detected, what was masked, and what was sent to the LLM. Compliance-ready reports for GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS. Integrates with enterprise DLP and CASB solutions for centralised governance.
🏢
Enterprise Deployment
Centralised policy management for IT teams — define masking rules, exception lists, and audit requirements via a management console. Deploy via MDM across all enterprise devices. SOC 2-ready configuration with full audit trail. Integrates with Okta, Azure AD, and other identity providers.

Protect your organisation's sensitive data from LLM exposure

SecureAgent is available for enterprise deployment. Zero data collection, maximum protection.

Request a Demo →